<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CM Tier 1 Capital : October 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prefblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561</link>
	<description>Canadian Preferred Shares - Data and Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:18:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PrefBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CM Raises Equity Capital</title>
		<link>http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561&#038;cpage=1#comment-8260</link>
		<dc:creator>PrefBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CM Raises Equity Capital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561#comment-8260</guid>
		<description>[...] These are very strong numbers compared with Year-end levels; with the entry of new equity holders kindly offering to take the first loss, the credit watch should probably be cancelled. Now, if only we could be sure that the bank can avoid shooting itself in the foot for another little while! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These are very strong numbers compared with Year-end levels; with the entry of new equity holders kindly offering to take the first loss, the credit watch should probably be cancelled. Now, if only we could be sure that the bank can avoid shooting itself in the foot for another little while! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jiHymas</title>
		<link>http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561&#038;cpage=1#comment-4128</link>
		<dc:creator>jiHymas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561#comment-4128</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll do a series soon on the Lifeco&#039;s and their MCCSR ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll do a series soon on the Lifeco&#8217;s and their MCCSR ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lafontaine</title>
		<link>http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561&#038;cpage=1#comment-4127</link>
		<dc:creator>lafontaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561#comment-4127</guid>
		<description>..........Otherwise, it is interesting to note that CM has the best protected Preferreds (with “protection” defined solely in terms of the regulatory risk-weighted-assets and capital that is junior to preferreds) while RY has the least protected............

How do you compare the Insurance Corps and POW and PWF in term of Protection ?

Louis Lafontaine
Mtl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Otherwise, it is interesting to note that CM has the best protected Preferreds (with “protection” defined solely in terms of the regulatory risk-weighted-assets and capital that is junior to preferreds) while RY has the least protected&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>How do you compare the Insurance Corps and POW and PWF in term of Protection ?</p>
<p>Louis Lafontaine<br />
Mtl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrefBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BNS Tier 1 Capital : October 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561&#038;cpage=1#comment-4115</link>
		<dc:creator>PrefBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BNS Tier 1 Capital : October 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561#comment-4115</guid>
		<description>[...] The Bank of Nova Scotia has released its Fourth Quarter Supplementary Information; I will analyze this in the same format as was has been recently done for CM, RY, NA, TD and BMO. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Bank of Nova Scotia has released its Fourth Quarter Supplementary Information; I will analyze this in the same format as was has been recently done for CM, RY, NA, TD and BMO. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrefBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; December 6, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561&#038;cpage=1#comment-4082</link>
		<dc:creator>PrefBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; December 6, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 03:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prefblog.com/?p=1561#comment-4082</guid>
		<description>[...] After CIBC&#8217;s earnings release this morning, Moody&#8217;s announced that it had: affirmed the ratings of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) and rated subsidiaries and changed their rating outlooks to negative from stable. CIBC is rated B- for bank financial strength, Aa2 for long-term deposits, and P-1 for short-term obligations. This rating action follows CIBC&#8217;s earnings report for the fourth quarter of 2007 in which it disclosed details of a hedged portfolio of Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO).  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After CIBC&#8217;s earnings release this morning, Moody&#8217;s announced that it had: affirmed the ratings of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) and rated subsidiaries and changed their rating outlooks to negative from stable. CIBC is rated B- for bank financial strength, Aa2 for long-term deposits, and P-1 for short-term obligations. This rating action follows CIBC&#8217;s earnings report for the fourth quarter of 2007 in which it disclosed details of a hedged portfolio of Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO).  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
